Sue Gray’s 12-page update on Downing Street gatherings has been published.
INVESTIGATION INTO ALLEGED GATHERINGS ON
GOVERNMENT PREMISES DURING COVID
RESTRICTIONS – UPDATE
31 January 2022
2
This page intentionally blank
3
INVESTIGATION INTO ALLEGED GATHERINGS ON GOVERNMENT PREMISES
DURING COVID RESTRICTIONS – UPDATE
- On 8 December 2021 the Prime Minister asked the Cabinet Secretary to carry out
an investigation into allegations reported in the media relating to gatherings in
No10 Downing Street and the Department for Education during November and
December 2020. - On 17 December 2021 the Cabinet Secretary recused himself from the
investigation as a result of allegations concerning an online quiz held by his private
office in the Cabinet Office on 17 December 2020 in 70 Whitehall. It was at this
point that I was asked to lead this work. - The terms of reference for the investigation were published on 9 December 2021
(Annex A). The primary purpose of the investigation was to establish a general
understanding of the nature of the gatherings including: attendance, the setting
and the purpose, with reference to adherence to the guidance in place at the time. - Where there were credible allegations relating to other gatherings these could also
be investigated. - In line with those terms of reference the following events were in scope:
• 15 May 2020; a photograph showing a number of groups in the garden of No
10 Downing Street;
• 20 May 2020: a gathering in the garden of No 10 Downing Street for No 10
staff;
• 18 June 2020: a gathering in the Cabinet Office, 70 Whitehall on the departure
of a No 10 private secretary;
• 19 June 2020: a gathering in the Cabinet room in No 10 Downing Street on the
Prime Minister’s birthday;
• 13 November 2020:
o a gathering in the No 10 Downing Street flat;
o a gathering in No 10 Downing Street on the departure of a special
adviser;
• 27 November 2020: a gathering in No 10 Downing Street on the departure of
a special adviser;
• 10 December 2020: a gathering in the Department for Education ahead of the
Christmas break;
• 15 December 2020: a gathering in No 10 Downing Street for an online
Christmas quiz;
4
• 17 December 2020:
o a gathering in Cabinet Office, 70 Whitehall to hold an online Christmas
quiz for the Cabinet Secretary’s private office;
o a gathering in Cabinet Office, 70 Whitehall on the departure of a senior
Cabinet Office official;
o a gathering in No 10 Downing Street on the departure of a No 10 official;
• 18 December 2020: a gathering in No 10 Downing Street ahead of the
Christmas break;
• 14 January 2021; a gathering in No 10 Downing Street on the departure of two
No 10 private secretaries;
• 16 April 2021;
o A gathering in No 10 Downing Street on the departure of a senior No 10
official;
o A gathering in No 10 Downing Street on the departure of another No 10
official.
Methodology - There has been widespread public interest in, and concern about, a number of
gatherings taking place in No 10 Downing Street and Whitehall during periods of
national Covid restrictions, where their necessity for work purposes has been open
to question. My task has been to establish, as far as possible, the facts surrounding
these gatherings. - In carrying out my investigation I have been supported by a small team of senior
civil servants in the Cabinet Office, who have no connection with the events under
examination and who are bound by the requirements of the Civil Service Code.
We carried out interviews of over 70 individuals, some more than once, and
examined relevant documentary and digital information, such as emails; Whatsapp
messages; text messages; photographs and building entry and exit logs. This has
also included searches of official records. As such, extensive substantive factual
information is now available and has been compiled by me and my team to fulfil
my obligation to establish the facts. The investigative work is now essentially
complete. - The Treasury Solicitor and Daniel Stilitz QC have provided independent advice as
to the process. - It is not for me to make a judgment on whether the criminal law has been broken;
that is properly a matter for law enforcement. In line with my terms of reference I
have been in regular contact with the Metropolitan Police as my work has
progressed in order for them to take decisions on the gatherings under
examination, including whether to launch their own investigation.
5
10.The Metropolitan Police has now confirmed that as a result of information provided
by the Cabinet Office investigation team, as well as assessments made by
Metropolitan Police officers, they are investigating the events on the dates set out
above with the exception of the gatherings on:
• 15 May 2020
• 27 November 2020
• 10 December 2020
• 15 December 2020
11.The police have confirmed that on the basis of the information available the
gatherings on these four dates are not considered to have reached the threshold
for criminal investigation. - No conclusions should be drawn, or inferences made from this other than it is now
for the police to consider the relevant material in relation to those incidents. The
police have also said this does not in itself mean that they will decide to take further
action or that there has necessarily been a breach of the regulations.
13.At the request of the police I have provided the material compiled in the course of
my investigation relevant to the gatherings that they are now investigating. I have
also been asked to retain all the other information collected in the course of this
work, which I have confirmed that I will do. I will therefore ensure the secure
storage and safekeeping of all the information gathered until such time as it may
be required further. I will not be circulating the information internally within
government, it has been provided in confidence to the Cabinet Office investigation
team and it is important that this confidence is maintained to protect the integrity of
the process.
14.As a result of the Metropolitan Police’s investigations, and so as not to prejudice
the police investigative process, they have told me that it would only be appropriate
to make minimal reference to the gatherings on the dates they are investigating.
Unfortunately, this necessarily means that I am extremely limited in what I can say
about those events and it is not possible at present to provide a meaningful report
setting out and analysing the extensive factual information I have been able to
gather.
15.In respect of the gatherings that the Metropolitan Police has assessed as not
reaching the threshold for criminal investigation; they have not requested any
limitations be placed on the description of those events, however, I have decided
not to publish factual accounts in relation to those four dates. I do not feel that I am
able to do so without detriment to the overall balance of the findings.
16.More generally, I did consider whether it would be better to pause, as provided for
in the terms of reference, and wait until the conclusion of the police investigation
before publishing anything. However, given the widespread public interest in, and
concern about, these matters, and to avoid further delay, I am providing an update
on the investigation and I am setting out some general findings now. I have not
made comment on whether individual gatherings were in line with the relevant
6
guidance and regulations in place at the time. I did not judge it appropriate to do
so given the police investigation that is now underway.
Context
17.The outbreak and spread of SARs Covid-19 represented a global public health
crisis without parallel in living memory. In the United Kingdom it had a seismic
impact on every aspect of life in the country. In response, to help control the spread
of the virus and to keep the most vulnerable safe, the UK Government put in place
far reaching restrictions on citizens that had direct and material impact on their
lives, livelihood and liberties.
18.From 26 March 2020 the law in England required everyone to remain in their
homes unless certain, very limited exemptions applied. Restrictions were
temporarily eased over the summer period in 2020 until most remaining national
restrictions were removed on 4 July 2020. Restrictions were then reintroduced in
gradations in the autumn culminating in the UK Government announcing from 5
November 2020 restrictions on movements and gatherings in England, essentially
requiring people to stay at home. Restrictions on gatherings of two or more people
applied in London through December 2020 and the first months of 2021. Indoor
mixing of two or more households was not permitted again until 17 May 2021. A
chronology of the main changes is at Annex B.
19.In line with those rules the vast majority of staff in Government Departments
worked from home. The Civil Service, along with the rest of the public sector, went
to great lengths to reconfigure the provision and delivery of public services and
support for businesses almost overnight. Many private sector businesses and
other organisations, large and small, all over the UK, were also working hard to
deal with the pandemic both in terms of managing their businesses, their
livelihoods and those of their employees, as well as providing vital support to the
national effort to respond to the virus.
20.A small number of Government officials and special advisers, because of the
nature of their jobs directly supporting the Prime Minister and other Ministers,
continued to attend their offices for the purposes of work, as permitted by an
exemption under the regulations.
21.In particular, No 10 Downing Street and the Cabinet Office were at the centre of
the Government’s response to the pandemic. Tight knit groups of officials and
advisers worked long hours under difficult conditions in buildings that could not be
easily adapted as Covid secure workplaces. No 10 Downing Street and the Cabinet
Office in 70 Whitehall are closely interconnected, with staff moving regularly
between the two buildings as part of their daily work. The Prime Minister’s flat and
the Downing Street garden are in close proximity to the offices and serve a dual
office and private purpose.
22.Those challenges, however, also applied to key and frontline workers across the
country who were working under equally, if not more, demanding conditions, often
at risk to their own health. It is important to remember the stringency of the public
7
health regulations in force in England over the relevant periods and that criminal
sanctions were applied to many found to be in breach of them. The hardship under
which citizens across the country worked, lived and sadly even died while
observing the Government’s regulations and guidance rigorously are known only
too well.
23.Every citizen has been impacted by the pandemic. Everyone has made personal
sacrifices, some the most profound, having been unable to see loved ones in their
last moments or care for vulnerable family and friends.
It is with that context in mind that I make the following general limited findings.
General findings
i. Against the backdrop of the pandemic, when the Government was asking
citizens to accept far-reaching restrictions on their lives, some of the behaviour
surrounding these gatherings is difficult to justify.
ii. At least some of the gatherings in question represent a serious failure to
observe not just the high standards expected of those working at the heart of
Government but also of the standards expected of the entire British population
at the time.
iii. At times it seems there was too little thought given to what was happening
across the country in considering the appropriateness of some of these
gatherings, the risks they presented to public health and how they might appear
to the public. There were failures of leadership and judgment by different parts
of No 10 and the Cabinet Office at different times. Some of the events should
not have been allowed to take place. Other events should not have been
allowed to develop as they did.
iv. The excessive consumption of alcohol is not appropriate in a professional
workplace at any time. Steps must be taken to ensure that every Government
Department has a clear and robust policy in place covering the consumption of
alcohol in the workplace.
v. The use of the garden at No 10 Downing Street should be primarily for the
Prime Minister and the private residents of No 10 and No 11 Downing Street.
During the pandemic it was often used as an extension of the workplace as a
more covid secure means of holding group meetings in a ventilated space. This
was a sensible measure that staff appreciated, but the garden was also used
for gatherings without clear authorisation or oversight. This was not
appropriate. Any official access to the space, including for meetings, should be
by invitation only and in a controlled environment.
vi. Some staff wanted to raise concerns about behaviours they witnessed at work
but at times felt unable to do so. No member of staff should feel unable to report
or challenge poor conduct where they witness it. There should be easier ways
8
for staff to raise such concerns informally, outside of the line management
chain.
vii. The number of staff working in No 10 Downing Street has steadily increased in
recent years. In terms of size, scale and range of responsibility it is now more
akin to a small Government Department than purely a dedicated Prime
Minister’s office. The structures that support the smooth operation of Downing
Street, however, have not evolved sufficiently to meet the demands of this
expansion. The leadership structures are fragmented and complicated and this
has sometimes led to the blurring of lines of accountability. Too much
responsibility and expectation is placed on the senior official whose principal
function is the direct support of the Prime Minister. This should be addressed
as a matter of priority.
Conclusion
24.The gatherings within the scope of this investigation are spread over a 20-month
period – a period that has been unique in recent times in terms of the complexity
and breadth of the demands on public servants and indeed the general public. The
whole of the country rose to the challenge. Ministers, special advisers and the Civil
Service, of which I am proud to be a part, were a key and dedicated part of that
national effort. However, as I have noted, a number of these gatherings should
not have been allowed to take place or to develop in the way that they did. There
is significant learning to be drawn from these events which must be addressed
immediately across Government. This does not need to wait for the police
investigations to be concluded.
9
ANNEX A: Terms of Reference: Investigations into staff gatherings in No10
Downing Street and the Department for Education
The Prime Minister has asked the Cabinet Secretary to carry out investigations into:
● allegations made of a gathering in No10 Downing Street on 27 November
2020;
● a gathering at the Department for Education on 10 December 2020; and
● allegations made of a gathering in No10 Downing Street on 18 December
2020.
Where there are credible allegations relating to other gatherings, these may be
investigated.
The primary purpose will be to establish swiftly a general understanding of the nature
of the gatherings, including attendance, the setting and the purpose, with reference
to adherence to the guidance in place at the time.
If required, the investigations will establish whether individual disciplinary action is
warranted.
The work will be undertaken by officials in the Cabinet Office at the direction of the
Cabinet Secretary, with support from the Government Legal Department.
The team will have access to all relevant records, and be able to speak to members
of staff.
As with all internal investigations, if during the course of the work any evidence
emerges of behaviour that is potentially a criminal offence, the matter will be referred
to the police and the Cabinet Office’s work may be paused. Matters relating to
adherence to the law are properly for the police to investigate and the Cabinet Office
will liaise with them as appropriate.
Any matters relating to the conduct of Ministers should follow the process set out in
the Ministerial Code in the normal way.
All Ministers, Special Advisers, and civil servants will be expected to co-operate with
the investigations.
Any staff with information relevant to the investigations should provide it to the
Cabinet Office investigation team.
Pastoral care and support will be provided to all staff involved.
The findings of the investigations will be made public. Following the long-standing
practice of successive administrations, any specific HR action against individuals will
remain confidential.
10
Annex B: Timeline of Regulations
26 March 2020: restrictions on leaving one’s home without a reasonable excuse, first
announced on 23 March, come into legal effect in England. Very limited exceptions
permit travel to work where it is not reasonably possible to work from home.
Participating in a gathering of more than two persons is prohibited except where the
gathering “is essential for work purposes”.
13 May 2020: leaving or being outside one’s home without a reasonable excuse
continues to be prohibited Some restrictions are relaxed to allow meetings outdoors
for exercise or recreation with one person from another household. Guidance
encourages those who cannot work from home to go back to work. At work, social
distancing advice applies with workplaces required “to avoid crowding and minimise
opportunities for the virus to spread by maintaining a distance of at least 2 metres (3
steps) between individuals wherever possible”
1 June 2020: England moves to “step 2” of the government’s roadmap in which
restrictions on leaving one’s home are removed. Gatherings of two or more persons
indoors and more than six outdoors are prohibited. An exception permits gatherings
that are “reasonably necessary …. for work purposes”
15 June 2020: Non-essential retail businesses are permitted to reopen and individual
prayer in places of worship is allowed again
4 July 2020: most remaining national restrictions are removed as pubs and restaurants
reopen. Gatherings of more than 30 persons are prohibited
5 July 2020: despite the removal of most national restrictions, local restrictions are
retained and reintroduced during July and August in certain areas, including Leicester,
Bolton, Greater Manchester and the North East
14 September 2020: a restriction on gatherings of more than six persons indoors and
outdoors (the “rule of six”) is introduced, subject to exceptions which include where
“the gathering is reasonably necessary…. for work purposes”
14 October 2020: a tiered system of progressive restrictions is introduced. London is
moved to Tier 2 (“High”), from 17 October, in which two or more persons are prohibited
from meeting indoors
5 November 2020: a second national lockdown is introduced which requires people to
stay at home and which prohibits gatherings with people from other households except
for permitted exceptions, including where the “gathering is reasonably necessary ….
for work purposes”
2 December 2020: England is divided again into three tiers, with London in Tier 2 in
which gatherings of two or more persons continue to be prohibited unless an
exception, such as where the gathering is reasonably necessary for work purposes,
applies. Government guidance for the Christmas period on visiting pubs and
restaurants advises: “although there are exemptions for work purposes, you must not
11
have a work Christmas lunch or party, where that is a primarily social activity and is
not otherwise permitted by the rules in your tier.”
16 December 2020: London is moved to Tier 3. Indoor gatherings of two or more
persons from different households continue to be prohibited. Social distancing remains
the rule at work, with offices advised “to maintain social distancing guidelines (2m, or
1m with risk mitigation where 2m is not viable), wherever possible, including while
arriving at and departing from work, while in work and when travelling between sites”.
20 December 2020: London is moved to a newly-created Tier 4 with much of South
East England, to help control the Alpha variant. The “stay at home restrictions” prohibit
leaving one’s home except for permitted purposes
6 January 2021: All areas of England are moved into Tier 4’s stay at home restrictions.
This is the third national lockdown. The stay at home restrictions prohibit leaving one’s
home except for permitted exceptions which include where it is “reasonably necessary
…. for the purposes of work” and where it is not reasonably possible to work from
home
29 March 2021: All areas of England move to Step 1 and the “stay at home restrictions”
are lifted. Gatherings of two or more persons indoors or more than six persons
outdoors are prohibited, subject to exceptions which include where a gathering is
“reasonably necessary… for work purposes”
12 April 2021: All of England moves to Step 2. Non essential retail businesses and
many outdoor venues reopen but the restrictions on social mixing indoors and
outdoors do not change
17 May 2021: All of England moves to Step 3, permitting six persons or two
households to mix indoors and up to 30 people to mix outdoors
And here are the most critical findings published under the heading “general findings”.
Against the backdrop of the pandemic, when the government was asking citizens to accept far-reaching restrictions on their lives, some of the behaviour surrounding these gatherings is difficult to justify.
At least some of the gatherings in question represent a serious failure to observe not just the high standards expected of those working at the heart of government but also of the standards expected of the entire British population at the time.
At times it seems there was too little thought given to what was happening across the country in considering the appropriateness of some of these gatherings, the risks they presented to public health and how they might appear to the public. There were failures of leadership and judgment by different parts of No 10 and the Cabinet Office at different times. Some of the events should not have been allowed to take place. Other events should not have been allowed to develop as they did.
The excessive consumption of alcohol is not appropriate in a professional workplace at any time. Steps must be taken to ensure that every government department has a clear and robust policy in place covering the consumption of alcohol in the workplace.
Sue Gray’s report into alleged gatherings on Government premises has finally been released.
The civil servant lists 16 gatherings that were in scope, and confirms that 12 of them are subject to Metropolitan Police investigation.
Gatherings on May 15, 2020, November 27, 2020, December 10, 2020 and December 15, 2020 were not considered to “have reached the threshold for criminal investigation”, but the remaining 12 are being investigated.
“Against the backdrop of the pandemic, when the Government was asking citizens to accept far-reaching restrictions on their lives, some of the behaviour surrounding these gatherings is difficult to justify,” Ms Gray writes.
“At least some of the gatherings in question represent a serious failure to observe not just the high standards expected of those working at the heart of Government but also of the standards expected of the entire British population at the time.Advertisement
“At times it seems there was too little thought given to what was happening across the country in considering the appropriateness of some of these gatherings, the risks they presented to public health and how they might appear to the public. There were failures of leadership and judgment by different parts of No 10 and the Cabinet Office at different times. Some of the events should not have been allowed to take place. Other events should not have been allowed to develop as they did.
Met Police are investigating 12 gatherings
The report includes a list of all the gatherings which were considered by Sue Gray during her investigation.
A total of 16 alleged Downing Street parties were investigated by the senior civil servant.
The report has confirmed that the Metropolitan Police are probing all but four events.
Those not under investigation include gatherings on:
- 15 May 2020
- 27 November 2020
- 10 December 2020
- 15 December 2020
The 12 gatherings being investigated by the Met are on at least eight separate dates, the report suggests
Sue Gray: ‘I am limited in what I can say and it is not possible to provide a meaningful report’
Sue Gray has spoken about how her report fits in with the Metropolitan Police’s inquiry.
She has caveated her report with a note to say she is “extremely limited in what I can say”.
She said she can only go into four of the 16 events being investigated by the police.
Ms Gray wrote: “As a result of the Metropolitan Police’s investigations, and so as not to prejudice the police investigative process, they have told me that it would only be appropriate to make minimal reference to the gatherings on the dates they are investigating.
“Unfortunately, this necessarily means that I am extremely limited in what I can say about those events and it is not possible at present to provide a meaningful report setting out and analysing the extensive factual information I have been able to gather.”
Sue Gray’s conclusion in full: A number of these gatherings should not have been allowed to take place
Sue Gray has concluded: “The gatherings within the scope of this investigation are spread over a 20-month period – a period that has been unique in recent times in terms of the complexity and breadth of the demands on public servants and indeed the general public.
“The whole of the country rose to the challenge. Ministers, special advisers and the Civil Service, of which I am proud to be a part, were a key and dedicated part of that national effort.
“However, as I have noted, a number of these gatherings should not have been allowed to take place or to develop in the way that they did.
“There is significant learning to be drawn from these events which must be addressed immediately across Government.
“This does not need to wait for the police investigations to be concluded.”
Leadership structures ‘sometimes led to the blurring of lines of accountability’
Sue Gray has said that the structure of Downing Street needs to be addressed and could have contributed to “blurring the lines of accountability” when it came to parties.
She wrote: “The number of staff working in No 10 Downing Street has steadily increased in recent years. In terms of size, scale and range of responsibility it is now more akin to a small Government Department than purely a dedicated Prime Minister’s office.
“The structures that support the smooth operation of Downing Street, however, have not evolved sufficiently to meet the demands of this expansion.
“The leadership structures are fragmented and complicated and this has sometimes led to the blurring of lines of accountability. Too much responsibility and expectation is placed on the senior official whose principal function is the direct support of the Prime Minister.
She continued: “This should be addressed as a matter of priority.”
No 10 staff wanted to raise concerns about behaviour but ‘felt unable to do so’ – Sue Gray report
Sue Gray has also raised questions about the culture of reporting at Downing Street in her report, saying some staff felt unable to raise concerns.
She said: “Some staff wanted to raise concerns about behaviours they witnessed at work but at times felt unable to do so.
“No member of staff should feel unable to report or challenge poor conduct where they witness it. There should be easier ways 8 for staff to raise such concerns informally, outside of the line management chain.”
Use of Downing Street gardens ‘not appropriate’
Sue Gray has made a finding on the use of Downing Street gardens for gatherings.
She said; “The use of the garden at No 10 Downing Street should be primarily for the Prime Minister and the private residents of No 10 and No 11 Downing Street.
“During the pandemic it was often used as an extension of the workplace as a more covid secure means of holding group meetings in a ventilated space.
“This was a sensible measure that staff appreciated, but the garden was also used for gatherings without clear authorisation or oversight.
“This was not appropriate. Any official access to the space, including for meetings, should be by invitation only and in a controlled environment.”
Every government department must review its policy on alcohol consumption
Sue Gray has called on every Government department to review its policy on alcohol consumption.
She said: “The excessive consumption of alcohol is not appropriate in a professional workplace at any time.
“Steps must be taken to ensure that every Government Department has a clear and robust policy in place covering the consumption of alcohol in the workplace.”
Sue Gray: There were ‘failures of leadership and judgement’ by parts of No 10
In her 12-page report, Sue Gray has said that some of the events should not have been allowed to take place.
She found: “At times it seems there was too little thought given to what was happening across the country in considering the appropriateness of some of these gatherings, the risks they presented to public health and how they might appear to the public.
“There were failures of leadership and judgment by different parts of No 10 and the Cabinet Office at different times.
“Some of the events should not have been allowed to take place.
“Other events should not have been allowed to develop as they did”
Some of the gatherings ‘represent a serious failure’
Sue Gray has found: “At least some of the gatherings in question represent a serious failure to observe not just the high standards expected of those working at the heart of Government but also of the standards expected of the entire British population at the time.“
As Andrew Eborn #The Futurist predicted 24 01 22
